No, you're wrong. I was basically saying you're not in control of your own actions because the male dominance structure made you marginalize women by 1) implying prostitution is a very negative thing that women CHOOSE voluntarily and thus 2) slamming women's sexuality. The THE MENZ MADE YOU DO IT thing is the argument I find most offensive about radical feminist rhetoric, just BECAUSE it makes us all look like brainwashed idiots without will of our own! But for you I'll make an exception.
Some women do choose it voluntarily! Just not many. And in that case, you're totally undermining your own rhetoric, making you look rather more like the brainwashed one.
Nonono, you're not thinking like a radical feminist, which was the ideology I was using to mock you and itself at the same time! No woman actually chooses prostitution in this ideology; if it LOOKS like they choose it, it's because you're not looking at all the societal/emotional/financial factors that in fact FORCED them to do it. This is also the faction that says that all heterosexual sex is rape, so. And it's not my rhetoric, I'm just borrowing it because you're an asshole.
You just arbitrarily chose that viewpoint for the sake of mocking it? Perhaps you need sleep.
Then again, this is how you usually act . . .
Numbnuts.
(And yes, I realize the sexual disconnect here, but it was too fun not to use. And besides, my 13-year-old brother uses it with girls, and he obviously knows everything.)
It wasn't even an insult to me, it was an insult to radical feminism!
Now you are making shit up. Bullshitter.
using the word "boob" to insult a girl does not make it any less gender-neutral than using "dickhead" to insult a boy does, so my point still stands. hell if I know where you're coming from
If the sentiment applies but not the logic, point, or purpose, then it just makes you look stupid!
No no no, enhanced boobs are just decoration. Non-lactating boobs are the result of surgery or cancer. Do you want all the cancerous women in the country after you?
Stupidhead.
there is no point in that except random association, you non sequiturer
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 06:54 am (UTC)Slut.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 06:59 am (UTC)Fuckwit.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:04 am (UTC)Dumbass.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:07 am (UTC)Asshole.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:12 am (UTC)Then again, this is how you usually act . . .
Numbnuts.
(And yes, I realize the sexual disconnect here, but it was too fun not to use. And besides, my 13-year-old brother uses it with girls, and he obviously knows everything.)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:14 am (UTC)Dickhead.
look at me, my insults are gender-neutral despite gender-specific terms here in special snowflake land
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:16 am (UTC)Boob.
oh look, I seem to have found my way in as well
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:19 am (UTC)Non-lactating nipple.
but it IS gender-specific, I HAVE boobs
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:24 am (UTC)What the hell was that? Moron.
gender-neutral means it can be used unequivocally to insult either gender, thus, it is gender-neutral
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:26 am (UTC)You're a boob without a BIOLOGICAL PURPOSE. USELESS, USELESS, USELESS.
in this context I was talking more about using phallic imagery to insult women and vice versa, though
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:30 am (UTC)Now you are making shit up. Bullshitter.
using the word "boob" to insult a girl does not make it any less gender-neutral than using "dickhead" to insult a boy does, so my point still stands. hell if I know where you're coming from
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:33 am (UTC)If you're a non-lactating boob, you're just decoration, sorry. Failure.
the point was that I was using dickhead to insult a girl
assuming you are one
oh see what I did there
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:45 am (UTC)No no no, enhanced boobs are just decoration. Non-lactating boobs are the result of surgery or cancer. Do you want all the cancerous women in the country after you?
Stupidhead.
there is no point in that except random association, you non sequiturer
assuming you have a brain
oh see what I did there
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 02:07 pm (UTC)I was talking about what you get on MEN. It was a reference to the gender neutrality conversation.
random association is a powerful and still-relevant technique in modern psychology
but you won't remember that, because you don't have a MEMORY
oh
no subject
Date: 2008-03-28 12:50 am (UTC)Those aren't boobs, they're pecs! Unless the guy is really fat. And you're still getting angry cancerous women after you.
but still stupid
according to the laws of logic, which are still in effect
but you're incapable of using them
OHHHHHHHHH