![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
List 10 of your favorite characters from different fandoms, and ask people to spot patterns in your choices, and if they're so inclined, to draw conclusions about you based on the patterns they've spotted.1. Dante (Devil May Cry)
2. Shawn Spencer (Psych)
3. Sam Witwicky (Transformers)
4. Lloyd Irving (Tales of Symphonia)
5. Dean Winchester (Supernatural)
6. Captain James T. Kirk (Star Trek: The Original Series)
7. The Road to El Dorado (Miguel)
8. Stan Marsh (South Park)
9. Jack Kelly (Newsies)
10. Son Gokuu (Saiyuuki)
There is absolutely no pattern there, none at all. It sort of bothers me that these are all dudes, but since I almost exclusively favor the main character and most of my fandoms are very action-oriented, it's not often that the lead is going to be a chick. It's not that my fandoms lack ass-kicking women, but usually it's the main character by definition who makes the dramatic moral decisions, and apparently someone deciding to do the right thing is the closest thing I will ever have to a kink.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 12:57 am (UTC)More hours, really? God, I am a black hole of fun when it comes to your job apparently, I AM SORRY I DO NOT MEAN TO BE, but I feel obligated to tell you that whenever I have been promised more hours in response to better sales/customer service/managers liking me better, it has always been a lie. Maybe GameStop has just poisoned me to this kind of thing.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 01:00 am (UTC)I don't know for sure or care, I am just doing the job as I understand it. I do know if they like me they'll give me more closing/opening hours because those are trusted positions.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 01:08 am (UTC)SO LONG AS NO ONE REALLY TAKES ADVANTAGE OF IT WITH THINGS YOU TOTALLY DO NOT WANT TO HEAR, I guess it is fine. Even then I guess it would be, uh, okay. You're sort of trusted already, aren't you? I get the impression you're totally alone there.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 02:03 am (UTC)